The INASP blog I referenced yesterday on HIFA is based on a commissioned external study to answer the question: What is the evidence on whether access to research work is still relevant and needed?
The study is available here: https://www.inasp.info/publications/access-research-global-south-reviewi...
The review concludes:
'This review set out to find out whether work around access to research still relevant and needed. The evidence reviewed indicates that it is because:
• Research can contribute to achieving development goals and impact;
• Access to research is a core component of research, research uptake and research capacity building systems;
• Current access to research is not equitable, with those working in LLMICs often disadvantaged by lack of the knowledge, skills, infrastructure and enabling environment required for effective access to electronic resources;
• Around two thirds of global research literature remains behind a paywall.'
Best wishes, Neil
Coordinator, HIFA Project on Access to Health Research
Let's build a future where people are no longer dying for lack of healthcare information - Join HIFA: www.hifa.org
HIFA profile: Neil Pakenham-Walsh is coordinator of the HIFA global health campaign (Healthcare Information For All - www.hifa.org ), a global community with more than 19,000 members in 177 countries, interacting on six global forums in four languages. Twitter: @hifa_org FB: facebook.com/HIFAdotORG firstname.lastname@example.org