Dear HIFA colleagues,
Two days ago we circulateda message on the Great Barrington Declaration, a controversial document that argues against lockdowns and calls for a reopening of schools, businesses and other entities, while protecting people deemed vulnerable to the virus because of age or other risk factors... The authors set up a website https://gbdeclaration.org/ and invite everyone to sign the Declaration.
The Lancet (Correspondence section) has published a response. The authors note:
'The arrival of a second wave and the realisation of the challenges ahead has led to renewed interest in a so-called herd immunity approach, which suggests allowing a large uncontrolled outbreak in the low-risk population while protecting the vulnerable. Proponents suggest this would lead to the development of infection-acquired population immunity in the low-risk population, which will eventually protect the vulnerable. This is a dangerous fallacy unsupported by scientific evidence.'
Similarly, these authors have set up a website and invite everyone to sign *their* declaration. https://www.johnsnowmemo.com
Comment (NPW): While it is understandable that the two groups are keen to demonstrate popular support for their positions, I am concerned that the response to these two declarations will unduly influence which policy is implemented (and I would predict that the first would 'win', despite being less supported by the evidence). Health policy should not be determined by the number of 'likes' on a declaration, but (wherever possible) by objective analysis.
Best wishes, Neil
Let's build a future where people are no longer dying for lack of healthcare information - Join HIFA: www.hifa.org
HIFA profile: Neil Pakenham-Walsh is coordinator of the HIFA global health campaign (Healthcare Information For All - www.hifa.org ), a global community with more than 19,000 members in 177 countries, interacting on six global forums in four languages in collaboration with WHO. Twitter: @hifa_org FB: facebook.com/HIFAdotORG email@example.com